The FTC’s Noncompete Ban Is Dead. What Smart NY Employers Should Do Now
The FTC’s Noncompete Ban Is Dead. What Smart NY Employers Should Do Now
Bottom line: The nationwide FTC ban on employee noncompete agreements is off the table. A Texas federal judge vacated the rule in August 2024, and on September 5, 2025 the FTC formally dropped its appeals and agreed to the vacatur. The Rule will not take effect.
That doesn’t mean “anything goes.” Expect continued case-by-case enforcement against overreaching restrictions, plus active state law (including possible new NY legislation). Now is the time to tune your agreements and practices—not to shelve them.
What changed
• The 2024 FTC Rule is vacated nationwide. The Northern District of Texas held the FTC lacked authority for such a sweeping rule and that the rule was arbitrary and capricious. The court’s order set the Rule aside; it never took effect.
• The FTC ended its appeals. On Sept. 5, 2025, the FTC moved to dismiss its Fifth and Eleventh Circuit appeals and acceded to vacatur.
• But enforcement isn’t gone. The FTC and DOJ can still challenge non-competes and look-alikes when they harm competition. Agencies have said they’ll continue policing abusive restraints even without a blanket rule.
Where New York stands
• No statewide ban—yet. Governor Hochul vetoed a broad ban in 2023 and has favored a narrower approach. New bills introduced in 2025 would restrict many noncompetes (especially for lower-wage workers) but have not been passed as of the date this article is published. However, there may be developments in 2026 or later.
• Current NY test = reasonableness. New York courts enforce noncompetes only if (1) necessary to protect legitimate interests (trade secrets, client relationships, unique services), (2) reasonable in scope/duration/geography, and (3) not harmful to the public.
Practical playbook for NY employers and nonprofits
1) Use noncompetes sparingly and narrowly
• Reserve for senior, truly key roles or in sale-of-business deals; keep durations short (often 6–12 months).
• Tie the clause to real protectable interests (document the “why”).
• Avoid blanket “industry-wide” or “nationwide” bans unless facts justify it.
2) Prefer safer alternatives
• NDA/Confidentiality: Comprehensive but tailored definition of confidential info; clear carve-outs; robust return-of-materials and device/drive access cooperation.
• Non-solicitation (customers/employees): Narrowly define “customer” (e.g., those with whom the employee had material contact in past 12–18 months).
• Non-interference/Non-raiding: Calibrate to real risks in your industry.
• IP/Work-made-for-hire + invention assignment: Especially for creative/technical roles.
• Reasonable “Garden Leave” (paid notice periods) for a handful of truly sensitive positions.
Why: Courts are more receptive to targeted restraints; agencies are less likely to view them as anticompetitive than broad noncompetes.
3) Align agreements with how you actually operate
• Role-based scoping: Map each restriction to job duties and access rights.
• Access minimization: Use IT permissions so fewer employees need sweeping restrictions.
• Compensation alignment: Consider bonuses/RSUs with forfeiture-for-competition that are lawful in NY (careful drafting required).
4) Update your onboarding/offboarding
• Onboarding: Signed agreements before start date; device and account policy acknowledgments; data classification training.
• Offboarding: Exit interview script; reminders of continuing obligations; certificate of compliance (return/deletion).
• For nonprofits: Ensure restrictions align with mission, do not chill whistleblowing, and don’t create private-benefit optics.
Red-flags that trigger enforcement or lawsuits
• Noncompetes for low-wage or non-sensitive roles
• “No future employment in our industry” language.
• One-size-fits-all templates used across unrelated roles.
• Retaliation or threats to enforce plainly unenforceable clauses
Action checklist
• Inventory your current contracts by role; flag any noncompetes used below director level.
• Replace many noncompetes with NDA + non-solicit tailored to recent customer contacts.
• Tighten definitions (confidential info, “compete,” “customer”), duration (≤12 months), and territory (facts-based).
• Train managers not to threaten enforcement casually; route disputes through counsel.
• Plan for NY changes: Keep a “patch file” ready if Albany moves a new bill in 2026.
FAQs
Can we keep our existing noncompetes?Yes—subject to NY reasonableness limits and antitrust risk. Consider narrowing at renewal and pairing with stronger NDA/non-solicit.
Will the FTC come after us now?Not for violating the vacated rule. But the FTC can still pursue unfair methods of competition on a case-by-case basis (e.g., collusive or coercive restraints).
What about future NY law?A broad ban failed in 2023; targeted bills resurfaced in 2025 and may return. Build portable agreements that will age well under likely NY reforms.
Attorney Advertising; Not Legal Advice
This overview is general information based on developments through Sept. 24, 2025. Outcomes vary by facts, industry, and employee level. For client-specific drafting or enforcement strategy, please contact our office.


