Demonstrate Value to Clients by Pitching an Outside General Counsel Role

Alex Herd • February 26, 2026

Share this article

Article by Alex Herd published by New York State Bar Association


The following article, written by Alex Herd, was published by the New York State Bar Association in Volume 45 of One On One on August 2, 2024. Available here.


Demonstrating value to prospective clients is vital to a business lawyer’s success. Your ability to articulate your skills and efficiency will help you convert not only prospects into clients, but also one-time clients to regular clients. You can accomplish this by effectively pitching the benefits of serving as Outside General Counsel (OGC): higher quality of service at a lower cost.


Many clients may be familiar with in-house or general counsel, but they may not have heard of the concept of an OGC. You can build long-standing relationships with clients by highlighting the key benefits of an OGC:


• Services tailored to their needs


• One-stop legal resource


• Cost-effectiveness


The Benefits of General Counsel, In-House or Outside


Businesses see their general counsel as their trusted first point of contact for any legal matter. 


General counsel is relied on for a wide-ranging scope of services to meet the diverse legal needs of the client. Some key examples include:


• Contract Review and Drafting: OGCs can review, negotiate, and draft a variety of commercial contracts, such as vendor agreements, leases, licensing deals, and sales/ purchase contracts. Their familiarity with the client’s business allows them to ensure contractual terms align with the organization’s long-term objectives.


• Compliance and Regulatory Guidance: OGCs can advise clients on complying with relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards applicable to their operations. This may include areas like employment law, data privacy,or financial reporting.


• Corporate Governance: OGCs can counsel clients on matters of corporate structure, board oversight, shareholder rights, and other governance best practices. This is especially important for privately held companies andnon-profit organizations.


• Litigation Support: While OGCs do not typically handle litigation directly, they can work closely with litigation counsel to provide strategic guidance, oversee the legal process, and ensure the client’s broader interests are represented.


• Risk Assessment and Mitigation: By deeply understanding the client’s operations, OGCs can proactively identify legal risks and collaborate with the client to implement policies, contracts, and other measures to mitigatethose risks.


A business that hires general counsel is able to develop the attorney-client relationship over time. This allows the attorney to learn the intricacies of the business’s goals and typical legal needs and efficiently and holistically address any issues that arise for the organization.


The key is for the OGC to deeply understand the client’s operations, goals, and typical legal needs. This allows the OGC to address any legal issues that arise in a way that benefits the entire organization, not just the specific matter at hand.


Pitching Outsider General Counsel as an Alternative to In-House Counsel


Clients may be skeptical that an OGC with multiple clients can deliver the same particularized attention as a dedicated in-house counsel; however, this concern can be turned into a positive. Rather than maintaining a full-time in-house counsel, the client can leverage the OGC’s diverse knowledge and flexible model to address their legal requirements in a cost-effective manner.


While in-house counsel only deals with matters that arise in representing one client, OGCs have the benefit of experiences spanning multiple business sectors and legal domains, such as contracts, employment, intellectual property, compliance, and litigation. This broad expertise enables the OGC to efficiently represent the client without the high overhead of a dedicated in-house legal team.


OGCs also often benefit from a trusted network of attorneys and professionals they can consult with when legal issues cross into specialized areas. This will allow clients to avoid navigating a web of specialized attorneys. This can save them significant time, money, and energy compared to the piecemeal approach of working with multiple law firms and the need to identify a new attorney each time a different legal issue arises.


OGCs can save the client time, money, and resources by managing all of their legal needs in one place, within a budget tailored to the client’s business.


What Characteristics Should Outside General Counsel Have?


Trustworthiness is one of the most crucial qualities for an outside general counsel. Clients need to have complete confidence that they can bring any legal issue to the OGC and receive effective guidance towards a solution. Building this level of trust requires providing strong strategic advice and demonstrating a steadfast commitment to the client’s best interests. 


Additionally, it is critical for an OGC to recognize the areas of law where their own expertise may be limited. Having a reliable network of trusted professionals, whether within the OGC’s own firm or external specialists, is essential for seeking additional guidance when needed to serve the client effectively.


Finally, the ability to address new and complex topics on a regular basis is key to succeeding as an OGC. Unlike specialized counsel who may handle similar matters repeatedly, OGCs must be prepared to tackle unique questions and challenges that their clients bring. While specialized attorneys may repeatedly draft similar contracts or motions, OGCs cannot rely on repetitive assignments. They must continuously expand their knowledge and adapt their approach to meet the diverse legal needs of their clients.


Alex Herd is the managing member of Herd Law Office LLC. He is an experienced business and non-profit attorney with a passion for helping small business owners and acting as a trusted advisor to his clients by serving as outside general counsel to many clients.


Reprinted with permission from the New York State Bar Association © 2024





Recent Posts

By Alex Herd • September 28, 2026
How to avoid misclassification mistakes.
By Alex Herd • August 31, 2026
What you should know about personal guarantees
By Alex Herd • August 12, 2026
What makes a business purchase or sale so complicated?
By Alex Herd • July 31, 2026
The Rule That Almost Killed a Practice Sale
By Alex Herd • July 15, 2026
Why We Prefer Flat Fees
By Alex Herd • May 4, 2026
The Importance of Planning Ahead
By Alex Herd • April 10, 2026
New Title
By Alex Herd • March 16, 2026
Most business disputes do not begin with a dramatic betrayal or a screaming match in a conference room. They usually start with something smaller. A cost increase. A delayed payment. A vague agreement. A partner making a decision without full buy-in. A vendor relationship that starts drifting off course. A client who expected one thing and believes they got something else. In other words, business conflict often starts the way many business problems start: with ordinary pressure and unclear expectations. Rising prices are one common trigger. So are cash flow issues, shifting responsibilities, changing priorities, poor communication, and disagreements about who has the authority to make decisions. On their own, these issues may seem manageable. But when they are layered onto a weak contract, a strained relationship, or a lack of process, they can turn into real legal and operational problems. Common issues that lead to business conflict Conflict can grow out of all kinds of day-to-day business issues, including: increased costs or pricing disputes unpaid invoices or late payments disagreements between owners or partners vendors failing to perform as expected clients pushing beyond the original scope of work unclear contract terms one side changing expectations midstream unauthorized decisions or commitments misunderstandings about roles, responsibilities, or ownership What these situations have in common is that they tend to raise the same underlying questions. What was actually agreed to? Who had authority to act? What does the contract say? What was communicated? And what is the smartest way to respond now? Why these problems escalate so quickly A lot of business relationships function on momentum and trust. That is not always a bad thing. But when something changes, whether it is money, timing, performance, or priorities, the gaps start to show. That is often when businesses realize: the contract does not clearly address the issue the parties understood the arrangement differently internal decision-making was not as clear as everyone assumed important communications were never properly documented nobody addressed the issue early because they hoped it would work itself out Hope is useful in many parts of life. It is not a particularly strong dispute resolution strategy. The best move is to be proactive The most effective way to deal with business conflict is often to reduce the chances of it happening in the first place. That usually means tightening up a few fundamentals. Clear agreements A good contract should do more than capture the basic deal. It should help address what happens when things go wrong or change. That can include pricing terms, payment obligations, approval procedures, change-of-scope terms, termination rights, ownership rules, and dispute resolution provisions. The less clear the agreement, the more room there is for conflict when pressure hits. Clear internal rules Many disputes are not just external. They are internal too. A partner, manager, or owner acts without full authority, makes a commitment, moves money, or changes direction, and now the business has a relationship problem both inside and outside the company. Clear internal governance and decision-making procedures can help prevent a lot of unnecessary damage. Clear communication Business disputes often get worse because people respond too fast, too casually, or too emotionally. One poorly worded email can make a solvable issue harder to resolve. A more strategic approach is usually to pause, review the documents and facts, and respond with a plan instead of irritation. What to do when conflict has already started Once a dispute is underway, speed matters. That does not mean every disagreement needs to become a legal battle. In fact, many disputes are best resolved through practical negotiation, better documentation, or a carefully structured business solution. But waiting too long can reduce options and increase cost. Getting help early can make it easier to: evaluate the legal and practical issues preserve useful leverage avoid admissions that create bigger problems protect important documents and communications resolve the issue before positions harden Often the goal is not simply to “win.” It is to protect the business, contain the distraction, and reach the best available outcome under the circumstances. The visible problem is not always the real problem What looks like a simple disagreement about money, timing, or performance may point to a larger issue underneath. A vendor dispute may reveal a bad contract. A client payment issue may expose scope creep or poor approval practices. A disagreement between partners may uncover governance problems that have been simmering for years. That is one reason it is important not to look at these issues too narrowly. The immediate conflict matters, but so does the structure around it. A practical legal approach matters Not every business dispute should be handled aggressively from the start. And not every issue should be treated like a minor misunderstanding either. The right response depends on the facts, the documents, the business relationship, the amount at stake, and the client’s goals. Sometimes preserving the relationship is the priority. Sometimes the priority is getting paid, limiting exposure, or stopping things from getting worse. That kind of judgment is hard to apply when you are in the middle of the conflict yourself. Final thought Business conflict often starts with a common problem that was never handled clearly enough on the front end. The best thing to do is be proactive: use strong contracts, clear processes, and thoughtful communication to reduce the chance of trouble. The next best thing is to get help quickly once the trouble starts. Many business disputes can still be resolved effectively, but they usually do not improve by being ignored.
By Alex Herd • February 27, 2026
Your Business Partner Took Money or Signed a Deal Without You: What Now?
Show More